Jan 8, 2012 - No, I'm not calling you stupid.
Those of you who were conscious beings during the 1992 presidential race know it's a play on Bill Clinton's campaign mantra: It's The Economy, Stupid. Those of you who were not conscious beings in 1992 -- or who haven't yet studied the 1992 presidential campaign in your history or political science classes -- should do yourself a favor and watch the movie War Room. You'll learn a lot about the Clinton campaign's single-minded focus on the failures of the economy under the first President Bush as a basis for electing Clinton. And it worked.
It's The Second Wild Card, Stupid is the mantra of many MLB front offices this off-season.
Maybe not the Marlins, where the opening of the new publicly-financed ballpark has the Fish in big-time spending mode. Maybe not the Angels, with a new, lucrative TV contract in hand. And maybe not the Rangers, who came within a strike of winning the World Series and then bid more than $50 million for the right to negotiate with Japanese pitching sensation Yu Darvish.
But look around. The rest of the teams expected to compete for a playoff spot are taking an incremental approach this off-season.
In the American League East, lots of folks -- here and elsewhere -- are talking about the Yankees' self-imposed payroll limits. The same for the Red Sox. Indeed, the Sox were linked to free-agent closer Ryan Madson but went the lower-cost route by trading for Andrew Bailey. Both teams are in need of starting pitching but neither has ponied up the money for Edwin Jackson. The Rays are doing their Rays thing -- locking up young players to team-friendly deals and looking for bargains in trades and free-agent signings. The Blue Jays reportedly went big in their bid for Yu Darvish, falling just short. Toronto might be in the hunt on Prince Fielder and Edwin Jackson could be a fit. The jury's still out.
In the Central, the Tigers are the team to beat and they've done little to add to last year's roster. Detroit will face payroll increases via arbitration for young players and are still looking for a starter, but that will likely happen via trade. The Indians look to challenge the Tigers. The Tribe brought back Grady Sizemore in a team-friendly deal and made a bid for Carlos Beltran before he signed with the Cardinals. The Tribe could still make a move or two, especially at first base, but don't expect big dollar commitments in Cleveland. The Twins are wondering what kind of value they'll get for the expensive, long-term contracts they gave to Joe Mauer and Justin Morneau. In the meantime, they added Josh Willingham for three years/$21 million and starter Jason Marquis for one year/$3 million, in the hopes of regaining the competitiveness they showed in 2000s.
And then there's the West, where the two-headed monster of the Rangers and Angels have dominated the big off-season moves. They may be the new Yankees-Red Sox, with the old ones started to take a more conservative approach.
In the National League East, the Phillies committed $50 million to Jonathan Papelbon over the next four years, but waited out Jimmy Rollins and signed him for only three years and $33 million. The Braves have stood pat for the most part. A trade or two is likely, but there is nothing to suggest the Braves will spend a lot on any remaining free agent. The Nationals are on the verge of competing with the Phillies and Braves. Signing Prince Fielder would put them in the mix, but so far, they haven't taken the leap.
In the Central, it's a three-team race among the Reds, Cardinals and Brewers. Cincinnati has improved via trades without adding much to the payroll. The Brewers let Prince Fielder leave and signed Aramis Ramirez and Alex Gonzalez instead, for a combined $17.25 million for 2012. The Cardinals saw Pujols leave for Anaheim and added Rafael Furcal and Carlos Beltran on two-year deals, costing the team $18.5 million for 2012.
What to make of the NL West? Purple Row's Andrew Fisher had an excellent round-up last week of the off-season moves, so far. The defending division champion Diamondbacks made a bunch of low-cost moves -- including the trade for Trevor Cahill -- and one moderately priced free-agent signing, adding Jason Kubel for two years/$15 million. They let higher-priced Joe Saunders leave to free-agency. The Giants have a $130 million payroll but it's saddled with a lot of dead weight (Barry Zito, Aaron Rowand and Aubrey Huff). They've added only low-cost options Angel Pagan and Melky Cabrera via trades. The Rockies added Michael Cuddyer and Ramon Hernandez for less than $14 million in 2012, and traded away Huston Street, among others.
What to make of this relative frugality? Sure, the Yankees and Red Sox have legitimate concerns about the steeper luxury tax in the new CBA. But for those teams, and others, why spend more than necessary to improve your chances of making the playoffs when there's a strong possibility there will be one additional playoff team in each league come this October?
Granted, a final decision to add a second Wild Card has yet to be made. Under the terms of the new CBA, that decision will come no later than March 1. But all signs suggest the decision's already been made -- if not announced -- and that we'll see two Wild Cards in each league this season.
That changes the calculus for the competitive teams.
Since the Wild Card was added to the playoffs in 1995, the win differential between the team that would have captured the second Wild Card -- had such a thing existed -- and the team with the next best record averages only 3.1 games. In the American League, that win differential is only 2.9 games.
If history is any guide, the battle for the second Wild Card in both the American and National Leagues will be decided by only a few games. Sure, every team says its goal is to win the World Series (well, most teams do). But winning the World Series is a crap shoot, isn't it? Look at the Cardinals in 2006 and 2011. Look at the Giants in 2010. Look at the Yankees, whose payroll grew from $125 million to $207 million between 2002 and 2011, with only one World Series championship to show for it.
Why spend more if doing so more doesn't necessarily provide a competitive advantage? Having the best, most expensive talent helps, but it's certainly no guarantee. Get into the playoffs and see what happens.
It's the Second Wild Card, stupid.
Yankees Sign John Maine To Minor-League Deal
Lance Berkman's Knee Surgery Will Have Him Out 8-10 Weeks
Orioles, Adam Jones Reportedly Agree To Extension +1
Ryan Howard Still Taking Batting Practice
John Danks DL'd With Shoulder Tightness
Austin Jackson Heading To Disabled List +1
Emilio Bonifacio Will Have Thumb Surgery +1
Brewers' Marco Estrada On DL With Quad Strain +1
Rumor: Yankees For Sale, Denied By Team +2
Brian Roberts Draws 2 Walks In Rehab Start
More News »
Comments
Great Article
I think this is the biggest story of the year, and certainly has the highest “Importance-to-Coverage Ratio”. As you have very skillfully illustrated, it’s (perhaps not so) subtly impacting the payrolls and roster decisions of nearly every front office in baseball. The luxury tax, as you point out, is another factor in these decisions, but it certainly appears that there has been a mini-revolution in baseball, and I think you’re right to attribute most of it to the two new playoff spots that will soon manifest. Great read, thanks.
by Midwestside on Jan 8, 2012 4:47 AM EST reply actions
I'm a bit surprised, actually
While the new wild card system seems like a great opportunity for cheaper teams to aim low, it’s also eliminating the safety-net of big-spenders that would have been expected to comfortably make the playoffs under the old format. Now that there’s a huge advantage to winning the division outright, I’d think that existing favorites with the resources—the Yankees and Red Sox being the most obvious examples—would be doing all they could to outpace their division rivals and avoid that one-and-done first round, but it looks like a lot of last year’s top performers are standing pat.
If the second wildcard is indeed used this season, it’s going to be a very interesting deadline. Not only are there gong to be more teams nominally “in it,” but there are going to be good teams desperate to cement their hold on the division who might have been willing to risk standing pat in years past. Nobody wants to be a seller at the deadline, but I expect that it will be a very good time to be one.
VAE PVTO DEVS FIO
by Bhaakon on Jan 8, 2012 6:53 AM EST reply actions
If they added another 10 Wildcards
My Metsies might have a chance!
by aronofsky40 on Jan 8, 2012 10:16 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
The only thing is
That there’s a big incentive to win your division, so you can avoid the wildcard playoff. Being second as opposed to first pretty much halves your chances of winning the World Series now, assuming you get a wildcard.
by A Behemoth on Jan 9, 2012 9:09 AM EST reply actions
I'd be interested to see
How much more likely a team would be to win best-of-5 as opposed to a 1 game playoff. I understand it’s a crapshoot in both situations, and the smaller the sample size the less predictable the result, but perhaps some front offices have determined the profitabiliy of a lower payroll and a 2nd WC berth is as much or greater than a division win and a 1st Round Elimination.
by Midwestside on Jan 9, 2012 9:24 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, if the goal is to win the World Series
I’m just not convinced that all competitive teams place a premium on winning the World Series, as opposed to just making the playoffs. I’m not advocating this strategy, but describing what I see.
@hangingsliders
facebook.com/hangingsliders
by Wendy Thurm on Jan 9, 2012 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
Luxury Tax
I think that the main issuefor the Yanks and Red Sox is that under the new CBA, the luxury tax goes up to 50% in the fourth year of overspending, and also the cap before you pay tax goes up much more slowly. I think the Yankees especially would like to reset their luxury tax clock as soon as possible.
A lot of the other teams you mention are never going to be big spenders – the Brewers, Reds, Rays and Braves for example are not going to be likely bidders for the top of the free agency market.
by A Behemoth on Jan 9, 2012 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed