Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

The O'Malleys And The Dodgers, With A Twist

Peter O'Malley, former Dodgers owner, is putting together a group to bid on the team. One of his partners comes from overseas.

Jan 31, 2012 - The O'Malley family's association with the Dodgers began in Brooklyn in the 1930s; Walter O'Malley worked for the team then, purchased a minority interest in 1944, and got controlling interest in the club in 1950.

Upon Walter's death in 1979, the family's ownership continued through Walter's son Peter This continued until 1998, when Peter O'Malley sold the Dodgers to Fox for somewhere north of $300 million, at the time the largest amount paid for a U.S. sports franchise.

In the 49 seasons from 1950 through 1998, the Dodgers were the crown jewel of the National League. They made the postseason 17 times, were in 13 World Series, and won six World Championships.

Since then, under the ownership of Fox and later the McCourts, the Dodgers have been ... well, let's charitably say "less successful". They have made the playoffs only four times since 1999 and not returned to the World Series, and the financial troubles of the McCourts are well chronicled; those troubles have now forced the sale of the team through a bankruptcy court.

It's been well-known that Peter O'Malley, now 74 years old, has been trying to put together a group to buy the Dodgers. The Los Angeles Times now reports that O'Malley might have found a partner to help finance his bid:

Peter O'Malley's bid to buy back the Dodgers is supported by financing from the South Korean conglomerate E-Land, two people familiar with the Dodgers' sale process said Monday.

If the O'Malley bid is successful, E-Land Chairman Song Soo Park will become a major investor in the Dodgers, one of the people said.

The ownership group also would have investors from Los Angeles. O'Malley has had discussions with Tony Ressler, a minority owner of the Milwaukee Brewers and co-founder of Los Angeles-based Ares Capital, according to a person familiar with the talks.

The article points out that foreign ownership wouldn't be an issue for MLB, as Nintendo owns a majority interest in the Mariners (incidentally, when the Mariners and Athletics open the 2012 season in Japan, it will be the first time Nintendo chairman Hiroshi Yamauchi sees the Mariners play in person).

If the O'Malley group's bid is successful, he'd become the president of the team, the same title he held from 1970 through 1998. Having a Korean company as a major investor in the Dodgers would likely raise that team's profile in that country; there was only one active major leaguer (Shin-Soo Choo) from Korea in 2011, but there are dozens more in the minor leagues and this would put the Dodgers at the forefront of developing talent there.

What's most remarkable about tha Los Angeles Times article, though, is this:

Frank McCourt, the Dodgers' departing owner, expects the team to sell for at least $1.5 billion. That would be almost double the previous record price for a major league club, set when the Ricketts family bought the Chicago Cubs for $845 million in 2009.

One point five billion dollars. Does that include half the city of Los Angeles as well as the team?

McCourt is desperate for money, but it doesn't seem as if the Dodgers would go for double the amount the Cubs did -- the Cubs sale included Wrigley Field, and it's not clear whether that $1.5 billion tab would include Dodger Stadium and its parking lots (if it did, it might be closer to McCourt's dream price).

There are eight groups still in the running for the Dodgers; several of them have longtime ties to the city or the team. But the idea of the O'Malley family returning the Dodgers to their former days of glory, especially with deep pockets from Asia backing them, has to appeal to the other MLB owners. It won't completely be up to them, because the bankruptcy court will have the final say. But if the O'Malley bid has solid financial backing, Peter O'Malley might just wind up running the Dodgers again, soon.

Do you like this post?

22359_1256997499464_1065394778_30839957_2068120_n_medium

Al Yellon

Editor

Al Yellon is a Cubs fan. For that, he hopes you will indulge him. He's seen Cubs failures since 1969, including the agonizingly close playoff misses in 1984 and 2003. For that, at least a bit of... Read full bio


Comments

Display:

It's the TV rights

Dodger TV rights payments alone, effective 2014, are expected to go for at least $4 billion over 20 years. $3 billion is the absolute floor.

by JonWeisman on Jan 31, 2012 12:17 PM EST reply actions  

Still

… are those being sold with the team? Why would you pay cash for those and then pay for the rights again?

Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation

by Al Yellon on Jan 31, 2012 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Presumably they aren't, but that doesn't change the calculation

$1.5 Billion now to buy a property that is pretty much sure to earn $3 – $4 Billion over the next 20 years, even before you look at the gate, parking, the merch share, etc. (Though parking may not be included in the deal; McCourt supposedly wants to hold onto that, as making money from flat empty asphalt is what he knows and loves best. But it’ could be the $1.5B figure includes the lots as a sort of poison pill gambit to enable him to “settle” for a lower price for the team while hanging onto the lots.)

by J0SER on Jan 31, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

And even if all this gets done

Somebody can still file an objection. You can bet your booties that we haven’t heard the last from Jamie McCourt yet. The only reason why Frank wants $1.5 billion is because he needs to finance his debts and his divorce settlement. Anything short of that will likely result in another round of bidding.

I'm a proud fan of the Minnesota Twins and Dallas Cowboys!
"Life is precious and time is a key element. Let’s make every moment count and help those who have a greater need than our own." – Harmon Killebrew
I would like to see Dallas vs the Giants on Thanksgiving, Make it happen NFL!

Check out my eBay items.

by Jessy S on Jan 31, 2012 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re not understanding me. You’re not paying for the team and the rights. You’re paying for the team so you can sell the rights. The $4 billion is guaranteed revenue for the new owner.

by JonWeisman on Feb 2, 2012 11:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed

28 updates with 39 comments

Like to see major updates on this story in Facebook.
Yahoo_full_count Yahoo_fantasy_baseball

Photo

The Busch Stadium Streaker, Or, A Man Who Made Good On A Promise

NEW YORK, NY: Ike Davis of the New York Mets strikes out in the seventh inning against the Arizona Diamondbacks at Citi Field in the Flushing neighborhood of the Queens borough of New York City. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)

What's Wrong With Ike Davis?

OAKLAND, CA:  Albert Pujols of the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim is congatulated by Mark Trumbo after hitting a solo home run in the third inning against the Oakland Athletics at O.co Coliseum in Oakland, California.  (Photo by Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)

Albert Pujols Finally Driving In Runs, Still Not Walking