Sentimentality doesn't win baseball games. But the Cubs proved this weekend that it can energize a fanbase.
Jan 15, 2012 - The Cubs had their annual convention this past weekend at the Chicago Hilton and Towers. Usually, these are pep rallies and a chance to discuss baseball with friends; fans can also ask questions of team management and spend too much money on overpriced pizza and baseball souvenirs.
This year, the Cubs actually broke some news at this event. Saturday, they announced that a LED board will be added to Wrigley Field.
But Friday night, the Cubs created high drama by announcing the re-signing of reliever Kerry Wood in front of thousands of Cubs fans at the opening ceremony of the convention. If you missed it -- or haven't seen it -- check out the deafening ovation this announcement received:
Now, even as a Cubs fan, I'm realistic. 14 years and multiple surgeries removed from his 20-strikeout game against the Astros, Wood today is a useful middle reliever/setup man, nothing more. His $3 million salary, a reasonable sum (with a 2013 option for the same amount) for that sort of work, reflects that status.
And yet, if you watched that video not knowing anything about this, you'd think the Cubs just signed a future Hall of Famer who will lead them to the Promised Land of a World Series title.
That's obviously not the case. Why, then, this signing, and done the way it was? Cubs President of Baseball Operations Theo Epstein explains:
"In Kerry's case, I think he has some added value beyond his performance on the field, which is still quite good and still the most important factor," Epstein said. "[Wood also is] an outstanding teammate and understands the importance of mentoring younger pitchers, he understands how to deal with some of the distractions here in Chicago, he's not shy about setting a good example in the clubhouse and he's an active member in the community.
Those things all have value, especially as Epstein and Cubs GM Jed Hoyer rebuild the roster and bring in a lot of younger players, but Wood was also in demand by other teams; there were rumors he was about to sign with the Phillies when he and the Cubs reached a deal, almost literally as the convention was about to begin. Hoyer acknowledged that Wood's history with the Cubs and their fans mattered:
"We both understand the history of the organization and understand which players mean a lot to the fans and the fan base and Kerry is one of them," general manager Jed Hoyer said this week. "That's something we're aware of. Fresh eyes are one thing but that doesn't mean you ignore the rich past the Cubs have."
But why do it in this way? A press release (which was issued at the time of the convention announcement) would have sufficed, right?
There is value to energizing your fanbase. Epstein and Hoyer understand that -- Epstein brought Jason Varitek and Tim Wakefield, both popular Red Sox players, for a year or two after they were truly effective players. (I don't think it is a coincidence that with the change in Boston management, neither player is likely to be back there in 2012.)
But why the timing? Epstein said this was not done for public relations:
"If you start making baseball decisions based on P.R., you're losing," Epstein said. "What does matter is the additional value that a player can bring by how he impacts his teammates. There's more to a player than just the numbers on the back of his baseball card. We want to try to fill that clubhouse with as many guys who get it as possible, and by 'get it,' I mean guys who are invested in the other 24 players."
Of course, that's true. But I believe there is room for sentiment in baseball decisions, to consider whether the players you sign will fit in with the rest of the roster and with the fanbase. If the clubhouse doesn't have strong player-leaders, it can fail even with talented players. Obviously, fans will support a winning team even if it doesn't have fan favorites. But there ought to be room, as the Cubs have made for Kerry Wood, for a player who is both productive on the field, a good clubhouse leader, and popular with the fans. I repeat Theo Epstein's words from above, with emphasis:
There's more to a player than just the numbers on the back of his baseball card.
Theo Epstein is a smart guy. And he clearly understands that fans have emotions and feelings about their favorite teams, and that players aren't automatons, but flesh-and-blood men who spend the better part of eight months a year together.
Sentiment doesn't win baseball games. But sometimes, grabbing hold of that emotion and making it work for you can energize everyone surrounding a baseball team and help it bring its talent to its peak.
Mark Ellis Injury: Dodgers 2B Has Emergency Leg Surgery
Adam Lind Placed On Outright Waivers, According To Report
Orlando Hudson Signing With White Sox, Says Robin Ventura
Brandon McCarthy Lands On 15-Day DL With Strained Right Shoulder
Emilio Bonifacio To DL With Sprained Thumb
Lance Berkman Leaves Game With Knee Injury
Chipper Jones Likely To Miss Weekend With Leg Contusion
Danny Duffy Indeed Having Tommy John Surgery
Diamondbacks' Chris Young Comes Off Disabled List
Allen Craig, Kyle McClellan Hit DL
More News »
Comments
He might be worth $3 million
just keeping him around as an object lesson for why you probably shouldn’t load that many innings on an arm that young (166 at age 21, about 900 through age 26), no matter how good he is.
See also: Willis, Dontrelle.
by bucdaddy on Jan 15, 2012 2:42 PM EST reply actions
Everything isn't so black and white
Plenty of pitchers have been used early in their careers and been fine for it (Sabathia – 1100+ IP through his age 26 season, Halladay cleared 800 by then). Yes, you don’t want to abuse a young pitchers arm, but who is to say the IP limit we use actually mean anything and Wood and Willis weren’t just more predisposed to arm injuries?
by njd.aitken on Jan 15, 2012 7:04 PM EST up reply actions
It is with Dusty Baker. See also Prior, Mark.
by Phrozen on Jan 15, 2012 7:09 PM EST up reply actions
Halladay
didn’t put up more than 150 innings in a season until he was 25.
Sabathia is an outlier. I wouldn’t want to stake my job on the one guy in 20 or 30 who can handle that kind of load at 20, 21.
See also: Gooden, Dwight (and is he the only pitcher ever who put up a 19-7 record and 3.83 ERA with just a 98 ERA+? That’s remarkable, isn’t it? He was worse than average.)
by bucdaddy on Jan 15, 2012 11:59 PM EST up reply actions
JV
Verlander’s rookie season was 2006 and pitched 186 innings at age 23. He’s pitched at least 200 innings every season since (and was at 828 IP in his age 26 season).
by HawkeyeEdward on Jan 16, 2012 10:37 AM EST up reply actions
I guess the question then would be:
Is there some way to tell the Verlanders and Sabathias from the Woods and Willises? “This guy can handle 800+, this guy can’t”?
by bucdaddy on Jan 16, 2012 11:10 AM EST up reply actions
It seems to me
that if you’re talking about a guy who’s willing to take the affordable salary, put up with what’s likely to be a tough season, and be a positive influence/model for any younger guys you have coming along, and he’s not taking a roster spot from anyone who needs to be there, it’s crazy not to sign him. And if the occasion lends itself to some extra theatrics, what’s the harm?
by CSFreeman on Jan 15, 2012 3:21 PM EST reply actions
Exactly. Signing him was pretty much a no brainer.
The extra theatrics were a plus.
The best husband in the world is going to the 2012 Randy Hundley Cubs Fantasy camp!
by katie casey on Jan 17, 2012 4:55 PM EST up reply actions
one of my co-workers is a cubs fan
and she was over the moon about this signing. something cubbies fans can enjoy about 2012.
R.I.P. Nick Adenhart - Always an Angel
by Kernel on Jan 15, 2012 7:14 PM EST reply actions
I'm surprised that
Cubs fans are sentimental about this guy. He had some good years with them, sure, but ultimately neither
a) lived up to the hype he had as the team’s long-term co-ace, due to injury
b) won a championship with them.
It’s not like he’s Mariano and brought them four rings…
by aronofsky40 on Jan 16, 2012 3:02 AM EST reply actions
Here's what it is.
It’s the 20K game, for starters.
It’s the fact that he was a standup guy when he started and lost Game 7 in 2003; he sat at his locker and took full responsibility and answered questions from reporters for a long time. A lot of players would not have done that.
And he was a key part of the 2008 division title team that won 97 games (he was the closer and saved 34 games).
He’s also embraced the city — he’s from Texas, but married a Chicago area woman and is living in Chicago and going to raise his kids there.
Cubs fans tend to embrace athletes like that. He’s just a stand-up guy. In the absence of rings, that counts for something.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
by Al Yellon on Jan 16, 2012 7:57 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
makes sense
by aronofsky40 on Jan 16, 2012 9:20 AM EST up reply actions
"One of us ... one of us ... one of us"
Tribal loyalty.
by bucdaddy on Jan 16, 2012 11:11 AM EST up reply actions
Exactly.
Join us for complete MLB coverage at SB Nation's Baseball Nation
by Al Yellon on Jan 16, 2012 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed