The 2011 Red Sox can hit, but it's possible they can hit better than anyone most of us remember seeing.
Aug 9, 2011 - It's not hard to notice that the Boston Red Sox have an impressive lineup. They lead the league in runs scored (625) and, in a year where just three teams are scoring more than five runs per game, they are scoring five-and-a-half. They are flush with MVP candidates, lead the league in OPS+, and are second in the majors in homers despite playing in a park that depresses them.
What's more surprising is how well those numbers stack up historically. We're so used to seeing Boston hit that it's easy to take their 2011 season for granted, but, according to both True Average and wRC+, the Red Sox are in line to possibly be the top offense of the last 50 years -- the entirety of the expansion era.
TAv is Baseball Prospectus's measure for offensive production, scaled to resemble batting average. It's adjusted for park and league contexts, so any team or player from any time period can be compared to one from a dissimilar era without trouble. As for wRC+, it is wOBA adjusted for park and league, and placed on a scale like OPS+: 100 is average, so with a glance you can see how far above or below-average a player or team is. More concisely, both numbers are up to the task of comparing the 2011 Red Sox to teams that came before.
One hundred and fourteen games into the season, the Red Sox rank behind just the 1976 Cincinnati Reds by both measures. While TAv and wRC+ can't agree on which Yankees teams of the last decade-plus are trailing Boston, the two do agree on the top three offenses of the last 50 years:
|
Team |
Year |
TAv |
wRC+ |
Runs |
|
CIN |
1976 |
.292 |
123 |
857 |
|
BOS |
2011 |
.291 |
121 |
625 |
|
MIL |
1982 |
.289 |
121 |
891 |
The 1982 Brewers featured a lineup with Robin Yount at his finest, when the 26-year-old shortstop took home his first MVP honors thanks to a league-leading 367 total bases. He wasn't alone, though. Cecil Cooper hit .313/.342/.528 with 32 homers and 73 extra-base hits; Gorman Thomas hit just .245, but did it with power (39 homers) and patience (84 walks); Ben Oglivie contributed 34 of the team's 216 homers. Four Brewers drove in at least 100 runs, and catcher Ted Simmons just missed making it five. The offense was so stacked that Paul Molitor and his 129 OPS+ looked ordinary.
The 1976 Reds are better known, as this was the Big Red Machine at its biggest, most efficient, and arguably even reddest. They went 102-60 to follow-up their 1975 World Series victory over the Red Sox, and earned a repeat by trouncing the Yankees in four games. Every single lineup regular finished above the league average offensively, as did most of their bench regulars: the "worst" starter was shortstop Dave Concepion, who hit .281/.335/.401 in a year when shortstops combined to hit .246/.308/.312.
Joe Morgan's 1976 is one of the all-time great seasons. He won his second MVP in a row, picked up a Gold Glove at second, and led the league in both on-base percentage (.444) and slugging (.576). His 186 OPS+ that year just misses top 100 all-time status (190), and this is back when second basemen hit like, well, second basemen (.256/.315/.335).
The Reds didn't do it with just Morgan, though. As a team, they led in every single major offensive category, except for caught stealing, where they ranked fifth. First in walks, first in hits, first in homers, tops in OPS, led in total bases, and even led in steals. Three Hall of Famer hitters were in this lineup (Morgan, Tony Perez, and Johnny Bench), as well as someone who would be in if not for some gambling problems.
The Red Sox can't throw Hall of Fame names around like the Reds and Brewers can -- this is an older team, but it isn't that old. They do, however, have a similar situation to the 1976 Reds, in that the rest of the league just isn't hitting, but Boston is, and like crazy. The average team hit .255/.320/.361 in 1976, whereas the Reds were at .280/.357/.424. They were the lone club to score over five runs per game, and not only were they the only team over 800 runs, they crossed the 850 mark, too.
In 2011, the average team is hitting .254/.320/.395, while the Red Sox are at .282/.354/.458. If not for the Yankees and their .284 TAv and 117 wRC+, Boston would already be ahead of the Reds -- the fact Cincinnati never had a threat as close to them as New York is to Boston is part of the reason they stand alone, as these stats are all relative.
Even with that, though, the Red Sox have just under two months of games left, and are right behind the Reds. They have cut out the dead weight in the lineup, too, so expecting them to keep on hitting -- or even improve -- during that stretch isn't crazy. If that's the case, we're currently watching the greatest offense of the expansion era do its thing.
Mark Ellis Injury: Dodgers 2B Has Emergency Leg Surgery
Adam Lind Placed On Outright Waivers, According To Report
Orlando Hudson Signing With White Sox, Says Robin Ventura
Brandon McCarthy Lands On 15-Day DL With Strained Right Shoulder
Emilio Bonifacio To DL With Sprained Thumb
Lance Berkman Leaves Game With Knee Injury
Chipper Jones Likely To Miss Weekend With Leg Contusion
Danny Duffy Indeed Having Tommy John Surgery
Diamondbacks' Chris Young Comes Off Disabled List
Allen Craig, Kyle McClellan Hit DL
More News »
Comments
Out of curiosity (and this is a total nitpick, the article itself is wonderful)
Why did you choose to use TAv rather than just use wOBA? You’re already citing wRC+.
I was just thinking this morning how unfair the Red Sox lineup is. Just devastating. They have like 6 or 7 guys with an OBP > .370.
Purple Row - For all of your Colorado Rockies-related needs
Learn about Batting Metrics
Learn about Pitching Metrics
by Andrew Martin on Aug 9, 2011 2:25 PM EDT reply actions
TAv vs. wOBA
Thanks, Andrew. wOBA is not adjusted for park or league difficulty, and the average wOBA moves with the average OBP. TAv is scaled so .260 is always considered average (just like 100 for wRC+). The fact wRC+ is adjusted for those things, and has the set scaling, is why I chose that.
TAv and wRC+ do the same thing a little differently, and with both saying these were the top three offenses of the last 50 years, I didn’t think I needed to choose just one, since it helped reinforce that hey, these three teams were/are really outstanding.
Twitter: @Marc_Normandin
by Marc Normandin on Aug 9, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Like I said, just a nitpick
I still feel like there’s some sort of “BP vs FG” school of making stats and which ones should be cited
Purple Row - For all of your Colorado Rockies-related needs
Learn about Batting Metrics
Learn about Pitching Metrics
by Andrew Martin on Aug 9, 2011 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions
I remember when we were a few weeks into this season and people were already writing off the sox due to their horrendous start.
What a bounce back.
Official prediction: The Angels will win the AL west this season.
by RexTookMyStash on Aug 9, 2011 3:15 PM EDT reply actions
I was reminded of this yesterday...
…when I did a repeat appearance on the Replacement Level Podcast. I had been on early in the season, and was asked about the Red Sox season to that point a few times, and kept giving boring answers like, “It’s been two weeks, it won’t last, nothing’s changed” etc. It’s not exciting radio, but hey, it was two weeks!
Twitter: @Marc_Normandin
by Marc Normandin on Aug 9, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed