Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Watch I'll Have Another Win the Preakness Stakes

The Only Red Sox-Yankees Article You'll Ever Need (If That's What You Want)

Aug 8, 2011 - Let me tell you about a wondrous fantasyland, a fantastical world beyond the scope of your imagination. In this magical realm, it's easy to care about Yankees/Red Sox games and appreciate them for the excellent match-ups that they are.

Madness, you say? Witchery? No, it's true, all true. There's a place where you can look at a television schedule, see a Yankees/Red Sox game on the docket, and think, "Say, that seems like a splendid game between two evenly matched rivals!" This land is named Dude, If You Think the Red Sox and Yankees Get Too Much Media Coverage, Seek Out Different Sources of Sports News and Opinion Land. Drink from the red vial and follow me. No, I said red vial. Well, hope you weren't planning on sleeping for a while.

People who complain about Red Sox/Yankees games are my new pet peeve:

Oh, great, look: the front page of ESPN.com is all Yankees and Red Sox.
Of course MLB Network is showing Yankees/Red Sox. I wanted to watch [other game].
Yeah, went to read some stories about Craig Counsell's hitless streak, but everything is all Boston this and New York that. Totally annoying.

The people who take the effort to complain this loudly fascinate me. It's like sitting across from someone at a restaurant who keeps sticking his tongue in an open salt shaker and saying, "Gaah, this salt is all salty!" You don't like the feeling of a tongue covered in salt? Keep your damned tongue out of there. That's a useful maxim, regardless of context. And the principle holds true with Yankees/Red Sox games. Feel like they get too much coverage from the sites you frequent? The shows you watch? Frequent different sites. Watch different shows.

At the turn of the millennium, there weren't a lot of options for sports websites. ESPN.com was pretty much the only game in town. They covered the minor leagues excellently (with John Sickels) and had regular columns on the analytical side of baseball (with some jerk who faded into obscurity), so it was one-stop shopping for baseball coverage. And if you wanted highlights on television, SportsCenter was the best bet for national coverage. ESPN dominated, and if they wanted to shove Yankees/Red Sox down your throat -- and if you wanted to keep abreast with sports news -- you had to sit there and take it.

Now? There are too many good sites out there. There's a lot of internet, and they're just giving the stuff away. It's really, really hard to read everything on FanGraphs, Baseball Prospectus, and Hardball Talk every day, and those are just three fantastic sites out of a billion. If I'm particularly sick of a certain topic -- say, oh, the Red Sox and Yankees -- that's almost a relief. Don't click on that article and catch up with the rest of the things you should be reading.

This goes for video coverage,too. There's video on the internet now, and everything. It's no longer necessary to sit through a half-hour of sports highlights to get to the teams you actually care about.

I was excited about the Yankees and Red Sox playing this weekend. They're two well-constructed, impressive teams. Both teams are stacked. Even before you take into account that they're blood rivals, these games are match-ups that baseball fans should look forward to. And they played a couple of great games, too. I could look forward to the games because I spend about 1/30th of my baseball time on the internet reading about the Red Sox or Yankees. This is because I can read and watch whatever in the heck I want to read and watch. The people who complain that they're sick of Yankees/Red Sox aren't trying hard enough.

There's a world of magic out there, a fantastical land of baseball. Come visit. In this land, Red Sox/Yankees games still take for ******* ever. Can't do anything about that. Actually, that's probably more annoying than the complaining. But if you're not watching these games because you're sick of the hype, you're doing the internet wrong.

Do you like this post?

Grant_brisbee_medium

Grant Brisbee

Editor

Grant Brisbee has been the lead writer for McCovey Chronicles since 2005, when the San Francisco Giants-themed site became the second blog on the SB Nation network. He graduated from San Jose State... Read full bio


Comments

Display:

Sunday night game

The Sox-Yanks game last night featured 5 runs and 19 hits took 4 hours and 15 minutes.
Meanwhile the National-Rockies game Saturday night which featured 22 runs and 33 hits on Saturday night took 3 hiurs 12 minutes.
what is wrong with this picture?

Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com

by Ray Guilfoyle on Aug 8, 2011 8:27 AM EDT reply actions  

not enough Sox-Yanks

I demand to be heard.

by Pikachu on Aug 8, 2011 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

a soccer game

had more action that last night’s game.

Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com

by Ray Guilfoyle on Aug 8, 2011 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

It shouldn't take four hours to do that

"Its like when i’m right…i’m right… and when i’m wrong…i could have been right..so i’m still right cause i could have been wrong"-Chevy Clarke's Twitter

by ryanfea on Aug 8, 2011 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind it if they only played 2 series

all year, but they just play each other so many times! It’s a great rivalry and all but I really lose interest after the 3rd series or so they play.

Follow me on Twitter: @DTD_Clayton | Editor for Down the Drive

by BigStein on Aug 8, 2011 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

I think this is a completely well reasoned argument...

But I think it ignores some things.

Some people do no live in a city in which they get to watch the team they obsess over. Maybe they can’t afford cable. Maybe they can’t afford mlb.tv Maybe they love watching baseball, but their entire weekend is spent watching the nationally broadcast games (Fox Saturday and Espn3.com Sunday). They’re forced to watch Yankees/Red Sox.

Sure, they’re well matched teams, and they might be good games. But why is that the game most people will see? Giants/Phillies were on on Satruday. Sure the Giants were worse than my little league team against the Phillies, but they were both in the playoffs last year. An NLCS rematch. That’s baseball worth watching. But MLB and major media decide what we watch because they assume most people want to. Perhaps they’re right, but I refuse to accept that they’re right.

I don’t want to watch the Yanks/Sox all weekend. I hear your well reasoned argument. I think you make valid points. I still think it’s ridiculous.

"Liberal is to the media what the 2008 San Francisco Giants are to good baseball."
-My Father.

by thecrippesking on Aug 8, 2011 9:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Fair enough.

That’s a good point. But at least it’s not Cubs/Cardinals over and over again, where one team kinda sucks.

by Grant Brisbee on Aug 8, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Are you saying my beloved Cubs don't suck enough for your lofty standards?

Tough crowd.

"Who ever heard of the Cubs losing a game they had to have?" -Frank Chance
"If [Ruth] had [called his shot], I would have knocked him down with the next pitch." -Charlie Root

by Clutch16 on Aug 8, 2011 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who is theees National-Rockies you speak of?

by Dale Sams on Aug 8, 2011 9:13 AM EDT reply actions  

two teams

with some exciting young talent…..

Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com

by Ray Guilfoyle on Aug 8, 2011 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Question

Is it okay to enjoy the matchup without listening to ESPN blow their load over everything that happens? How do I work the remote to remove the sound?

by myerkc on Aug 8, 2011 9:54 AM EDT reply actions  

great argument....

Maybe you should stop going to websites where people complain.

by Mark Mandingo on Aug 8, 2011 10:38 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Almost had me!

But I can’t avoid them as part of my job.

by Grant Brisbee on Aug 8, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, I'll give you that

but is there nothing non sports related on TV or the internet that you complain about. The point is that it doesn’t matter that I can change channels. I come to SB Nation because I like SB Nation. I roll my eyes every time I see a front page article about Redsoxyankees. This was a front page article on Redsoxyankees. So you’re saying because I’m annoyed, I should never come back. Probably not.

What I think you mean is that there’s plenty of non redsoxyankees news for me to spend 24 hours reading it and I have other options. It doesn’t mean it’s still not annoying. I also get annoyed when I see Jersey Shore people on CNN. It doesn’t mean I’m fine with switching over to Fox News, or MSNBC. Basically your argument could be applied to 96 percent of all complaints.

by Mark Mandingo on Aug 8, 2011 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah.
What I think you mean is that there’s plenty of non redsoxyankees news for me to spend 24 hours reading it and I have other options. It doesn’t mean it’s still not annoying. I also get annoyed when I see Jersey Shore people on CNN. It doesn’t mean I’m fine with switching over to Fox News, or MSNBC. Basically your argument could be applied to 96 percent of all complaints.

Yeah. But when I complain about complainers, I get to pretend I’m on the higher ground.

The Jersey Shore thing is similar — still don’t know a thing about them. Maybe I just have a gift for shutting off my brain that most people don’t have. Click.

by Grant Brisbee on Aug 8, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hello.

This is technically not a baseball article because you failed to mention Jeter.

by djfivenine on Aug 8, 2011 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

thecrippesking makes a great point – I myself live in an area where I’m not close to any MLB team, but the powers-that-be say it’s the Rockies. Nothing wrong with the Rockies, but it gets added to the national TV focus on a few teams – eventually I can see almost anybody, but in the NL, and against the Rockies. It’s like in olden times where you ended up seeing the Braves every night.

I’m quite sure the Sox/Yankees gets the highest ratings, but I wish they didn’t ignore great pitching matchups, etc, etc. I’ll watch, I don’t know, King Felix against Weaver as opposed to whatever else might be on, but good luck on that.

I can get my fix most certainly on the internet, but “print” is not really watching baseball, que no?

by stephsbear on Aug 8, 2011 11:51 AM EDT reply actions  

My biggest complaint

Everything is “XYZ Nation” these days…Cubs Nation, Red Sox Nation, Baseball Nation, IHateRedSoxYankeesBeingEverywhere Nation…

by hansman1982 on Aug 8, 2011 2:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

But if you use acronyms like SBN. Suddenly it isn’t so annoying

"Its like when i’m right…i’m right… and when i’m wrong…i could have been right..so i’m still right cause i could have been wrong"-Chevy Clarke's Twitter

by ryanfea on Aug 8, 2011 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed

Yahoo_full_count Yahoo_fantasy_baseball

Photo

Baseball On Par With Other Professional Sports In Dealing With Bad Umpires

LOS ANGELES, CA:  Mark Ellis #14 of the Los Angeles Dodgers gets help from Dee Gordon #9 after a collision at second base with Tyler Greene #27 of the St. Louis Cardinals during the seventh inning at Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles, California.  (Photo by Harry How/Getty Images)

Mark Ellis Injury: Dodgers 2B Has Emergency Leg Surgery

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20:  Stephen Strasburg #37 of the Washington Nationals celebrates with teammates after hitting his first career home run in the fourth inning against the Baltimore Orioles during interleague play at Nationals Park on May 20, 2012 in Washington, DC.  (Photo by Greg Fiume/Getty Images)

Stephen Strasburg Pulled Early With 'Arm Fatigue', Downplays Significance