Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Is FSU Really The ACC's Most Valuable Team?

SB Nation Question of the Day

Did Steroids 'Save' Baseball?

Apr 6, 2011 - Supposedly Steve Phillips said this last week on his XM Radio show:

While discussing the Barry Bonds perjury trial, Phillips went on to suggest that steroids helped the game.

"Thank God for steroids," he said. "It brought the game back from extinction."

If I may? No man or group of men, nor some muscle-building drug, has ever saved baseball.

Babe Ruth didn't save baseball, nor did Kennesaw Mountain Landis.

Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa didn't save baseball, nor did Cal Ripken.

All of those might have, in some small degree, facilitated baseball's economic fortunes for short periods of time. But I will argue with virtually no reservation that if none of those men had been born, baseball today would be almost exactly what it is.

The game has always been bigger than any one man. Or even any two men, juiced up on 'roids.

Do you like this post?

Head_medium

Rob Neyer

National Baseball Editor

Rob Neyer began his career with legendary baseball author Bill James, and later worked for STATS, Inc. and ESPN.com, writing more words for that website than anyone else. Rob has written or... Read full bio


Comments

Display:

I don’t understand why the players from that era are going to be crucified if this is the opinion of someone who was in a front office during that time. If he thinks this, why wouldn’t the players use steroids?

by Phildo on Apr 6, 2011 9:16 AM EDT reply actions  

I do not condone steroid use but its use in baseball definitely coincides with other changes in the game over the years and I think it has contributed to baseball’s growth and entertainment value. Virtually every stadium in the US has seen their fences shortened for the simple fact that people would rather see more homeruns than pop flys.

Also just because a few guys have been called out for taking steroids doesn’t mean there isn’t a much larger population of athletes taking them, both minor and major leaguers, but especially minor leagers. There are certainly players that have amazing talent and are completely clean, but it would be naive to assume that there aren’t 100’s upon 100’s of players who have worked their way up using performance enhancing drugs. At the end of the day if you are getting paid to be the best, but you naturally can’t get there, you are going to take something (not my mindset, but I think many players struggle with this). So I definitely think it has changed the game, definitely increased entertainment value, but unfortunately has made some athletes terrible role models for young athletes.

by gckid on Apr 6, 2011 10:26 AM EDT reply actions  

I understand that everyone’s experience is different but steroids in no way saved baseball for me. I didn’t watch baseball when I was young. I watched basketball and football but not baseball. That changed when I was nine when the Yankees played the Mariners in the 1995 playoffs. That series hooked me on baseball. I watched it with my father and during the games he told me about going to Yankee stadium and watching Mickey Mantle. I’ve been hooked ever since. And in 1998 at age 12 I rooted against Mcgwire because even at 12 I knew that a guy that had andro sitting in his locker was probably hitting some pharmaceutically induced home runs. And while Kennisaw Mountain Landis might have helped baseball after the black sox scandal his stance on black players denied Satchel Paige and Josh Gibson the chance to play against the best. So he might have done as much to damage the game as save it.

by Pflood83 on Apr 6, 2011 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Show some commitment

Be a little more definitive, Rob.
1) Steve Phillips “supposedly” said… Did he say it, or didn’t he?
2) “virtually” no reservations. So, What are your reservations? Why can’t you say you have No Reservations Period. You should let us know why you can’t.
3) “Almost Exactly” in other words, it was different based on those players.

I agree with your original premise that these guys didn’t save baseball, it was never going anywhere, certainly not to extinction. BUT, then you changed to the idea that these guys had (as you put it) no significant effect on the popularity of the game. That’s just ignorant, and I don’t think you would really put your foot down on that point now that a light is shined on it. Would you?

by YleeXOtee on Apr 6, 2011 11:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Jose Saves after Steroids Score

It brought the game back yes, but in a unhealthy and unrealistic way. Baseball is different from Beer League Softball just like legitimate Wrestling is different from the WWE. Baseball is on the right path, now if they could just decide whether or not to have a DH and contract to 28 teams we’d really have something but I digress. In all seriousness Jose Canseco saved baseball.

by Jeff-Ct on Apr 6, 2011 11:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed

Yahoo_full_count Yahoo_fantasy_baseball

Anaheim, CA, USA; Los Angeles Angels first baseman Mark Trumbo celebrates after hitting a home run against the Toronto Blue Jays at Angel Stadium of Anaheim.  The Angels won 6-2. Credit: Kelvin Kuo-US PRESSWIRE

The Angel Who's Improved

Los Angeles, CA, USA; Los Angeles Dodgers catcher A.J. Ellis gets brushed back by a pitch as Colorado Rockies catcher Ramon Hernandez catches the ball at Dodger Stadium. Dodgers won 11-4. Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-US PRESSWIRE

A Decade Of Patience, Patience

CHICAGO, IL: Danny Duffy #23 of the Kansas City Royals leaves the game against the Chicago White Sox in the first inning with an injury at U.S. Cellular Field in Chicago, Illinois.  (Photo by David Banks/Getty Images)

The Royals And Pitcher Development