Al Yellon
Editor
It's Gotta Be The Hair - May 15
Grant Brisbee
Editor
Tarasco Sauce - May 16
Jeff Sullivan
Editor
Mission Accomplished - May 16
Rob Neyer
National Baseball Editor
Baseball is Unpredictable - May 12
Dan Moore
Contributor
Joey Votto And The Twilight Of The Giant First Basemen - Apr 14
Jim Baker
Contributor
eBay Item Of The Day - May 15
Marc Normandin
Contributor
The Royals And Pitcher Development - May 15
Wendy Thurm
Contributor
On Being Young And Brash In The Social Media Age - May 12
By Rob Neyer - National Baseball Editor
Follow @sbnbaseball on Twitter, and Like Baseball Nation on Facebook.
Apr 20, 2011 - Someone named Richie Whitt took some heat for writing this after the Rangers, Monday night, lost the first game of their series with the Angels:
In Game 2, Colby Lewis is scheduled to start after missing his last regular turn in the rotation because -- I'm not making this up -- his wife, Jenny, was giving birth in California. To the couple's second child.
Don't have kids of my own but I raised a step-son for eight years. I know all about sacrifice and love and how great children are.
But a pitcher missing one of maybe 30 starts? And it's all kosher because of Major League Baseball's new paternity leave rule?
You should have seen Twitter after Whitt's column made the rounds!
Here's just a taste. Last I checked, though, the opinions were unanimous: Richie Whitt is more un-American than public transportation, getting pushed around by the Kaiser, and subtitled movies with ambiguous endings. All rolled into one roiling mass of Red Communism.
This discussion reminds me -- as so many do -- of George Carlin's brief bit about driving (video here); essentially, anyone who drives slower than you is an idiot, while everyone who drives faster than you is a maniac.
What if we're talking about your favorite NFL team's quarterback? Do you want him skipping Sunday's big game to attend the birth of his third child? Yeah? What if it's the Super Bowl?
The answer's not so obvious now, huh?
I'm going to be honest here, as I have been since the first time this came up, some years ago (official paternity leave is new, but players taking a game off to attend childbirth is not) ... As a human being, I think this is fantastic. As a baseball fan, though? If my team's in the playoff hunt, I'm sorry, but I don't want one of my starting pitchers taking the night off. We're not talking about some guy who works on the assembly line for the Integrated Widget Corporation. We're talking about one of the most talented pitchers on the planet, not easily replaceable. What if your team finishes one game short of the playoffs? Was it really worth it?
Or as a sage philosopher once observed, The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
And last I checked, there were many fans of the Texas Rangers.
Read More: Colby Lewis (P - TEX), Texas Rangers, Los Angeles Angels
Follow @sbnbaseball on Twitter, and Like Baseball Nation on Facebook.
62 comments
National Baseball Editor
Rob Neyer began his career with legendary baseball author Bill James, and later worked for STATS, Inc. and ESPN.com, writing more words for that website than anyone else. Rob has written or... Read full bio
SB Nation Profile
@robneyer
Subscribe to Rob Neyer
Mickey Hatcher, Angels Hitting Coach, Relieved Of Duties
Vance Worley Has 'Soreness', Will Miss Wednesday Start
Justin Morneau Will Be Activated From DL Wednesday
Manny Ramirez Rehab Assignment Will Start Saturday In Albuquerque
Jon Jay Heading To Disabled List; Shane Robinson Recalled
Troy Tulowitzki Day-To-Day With Deep Leg Bruise
Matt Kemp Goes On 15-Day DL With Sore Hamstring
Jeff Niemann Likely Missing 'A Few Months' With Leg Injury
VIDEO: Bryce Harper's First Career Home Run
Torii Hunter Placed On Restricted List Following Son's Arrest
More News »






Comments
This isn't a pennant race
It’s April. I doubt he’d miss a late September start if the team really needed him. Baseball is his job, not his entire life. Long after he’s out of the game, he’ll still be a father.
by diamondnerd on Apr 20, 2011 8:53 AM EDT reply actions
Just as important
The only problem with that argument is his April starts are just as important as his September starts in the grand scheme of things.
Sincerely – a bummed out Red Sox fan
by SmokeyJoeWood on Apr 20, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Except not.
If it were September, Wash would have let Colby pitch on 3 days rest, which he requested to do last week before paternity leave.
Baseball is played differently during April than in September, like all sports. The strategy changes as the picture is painted.
"Don't play lawyer ball, son." -Hank Hill
by analogdan on Apr 20, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah
I guess what I meant by “the grand scheme of things” is the win / loss column.
by SmokeyJoeWood on Apr 20, 2011 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions
My $0.02
Food for thought, but as a father whose parenting is right at the centre of my life, I’d be extra-proud of an athlete putting his children and family above all else. And frankly, the needs of the many are met in a different way by this action, as any improved parenting that results from the positive role modeling is welcome.
After all, we can always use more good fathers.
by superpriebe on Apr 20, 2011 9:17 AM EDT reply actions
we could always use less children
and more starting pitchers.
by puquerda on Apr 21, 2011 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Also of matter, is he really missing a start? Or did they just move him back a game and someone else up a game?
by ThatGuy22 on Apr 20, 2011 9:42 AM EDT reply actions
excellent point @ThatGuy22
This is not a big deal it is one start and like you said they might just adjust the rotation and with so many off days early in the season he may not be pitching on certain days anyways and miss a start for a better pitcher.
Mountain West Connection The best site for MWC sports!
SB Nation Denver
Follow me on twitter!
by Jeremy Mauss on Apr 20, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Let's see what WAR says
Colby Lewis’ WAR was 4.4 last season over 32 starts. That works out to 0.1375 Wins Above Replacement per start. Unless I’m misusing the stat, it seems like it’s not that big of a deal to skip a start.
Oh, and he skipped a start against the Yankees. And his ERA is currently 5.82. There’s a good chance the Rangers would have lost that game anyway.
by joet on Apr 20, 2011 10:07 AM EDT reply actions
Honestly?
I’d think less of an athlete who DIDN’T miss his start.
On Twitter: @baseballtwit
by adarowski on Apr 20, 2011 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
exactly
by JaySchu on Apr 20, 2011 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Family should always come first
Yeah, his job is dependent on keeping the fans pleased but it’s not like he has to go home to them after the game. His job is really no different than any other persons in this country and we’d all be a bit miffed if we were kept at work while our wife was giving birth (let alone the fact that she would never forgive you for it).
So it doesn’t matter if it’s the World Series or not, his family is the priority. Besides, if it was the playoffs or World Series I’m sure he would just push to have it induced between starts.
by JaySchu on Apr 20, 2011 10:14 AM EDT reply actions
Just to be clear about this, everyone ...
So if you’re a Phillies fan, you’re okay with Roy Halladay missing Game 7 to be with his wife at the hospital, and Joe Blanton starting instead?
by Rob Neyer on Apr 20, 2011 11:37 AM EDT reply actions
There should just be a ban on baseball players having sex without contraceptives in January
by Kevin McCauley on Apr 20, 2011 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
No, I'm not serious
But if I was a baseball player who was married and ready to have children, I’d inform my wife of this possible issue and make sure our kid wasn’t due in October
by Kevin McCauley on Apr 20, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Actually...
What you say is somewhat reasonable, if a bit over the top, in the scheme of things. The huge plurality of teachers have kids more in July and August because when many of them decide to have kids, they do their best to work out the timing so as not to miss a bunch of time at work—especially before maternity and paternity leave were so common. That doesn’t always work out. But it is probably true that if you are a ballplayer, and you are planning to have kids, the attempts probably shouldn’t come in January.
by Brad Newberg on Apr 20, 2011 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Koufax missed WS games for Yom Kippur
And I’m not aware that anyone gave him grief about it.
by tomemos on Apr 20, 2011 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
They would have been sent to prison if they had
Only Mel Gibson could do that and live another week.
by Free_AEC on Apr 20, 2011 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Plus
Are you saying that there’s no difference at all between a game in mid-April and the indisputably most important game of the year (Game 7)? Perhaps players can be trusted with discretion as to their priorities here.
by tomemos on Apr 20, 2011 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Perhaps the players can.
I’m asking what you, as fans, think.
by Rob Neyer on Apr 20, 2011 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, speaking personally
I think that the Super Bowl/Game 7 argument is not only a false comparison, but a distraction, since it will almost certainly never come up (and I mean never). I also think that criticisms of baseball’s paternity leave are pretty loaded in a country where paternity leave is the exception rather than the rule in the workplace, and in which men are not only not expected to play a huge role in their families but are actually considered somewhat feminine for doing so. So I’m encouraged to see the unanimity of the criticism here.
by tomemos on Apr 20, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Where is the line, though...an interesting question
I don’t think Rob was drawing an analogy between an April start and a Gm 7 start. (Have you read his work?…He’s not an idiot.) I think he’s trying to see where the line is for us fans. It seems pretty unanimous that April start = not a big deal. World Series Gm7 start = no brainer. I, too, think it’s interesting to see where that line of parental support becomes contentious. A one-game regular season playoff? Gm 7 of the LCS? Gm 5 of the LDS? What about Gm 5 of a 2-2 World Series? Where does the unanimity stop? Otherwise it’s a stupid conversation.
Another question. You seem pretty excited that he wants to see the kid being born. Being there is important. How do you square this support with a profession that will keep him on the road (away from his kid) rougly half the year? Either being there is super important, or just part of a larger equation. (I personally feel the latter is true.)
by Kalaska on Apr 20, 2011 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think Rob is an idiot, obviously
But I do think he can be strangely obtuse about human emotions and conventions. Did you read his post on the occasion of Lou Gorman’s death? It was entirely about how wrong Gorman was to trade Jeff Bagwell back in 1991. It was weirdly ghoulish and tone-deaf, and when I read the above piece about Lewis I started to think, “Maybe Rob doesn’t, like, get people.”
As for Colby Lewis’s job and family, the answer is simple: it’s not my business what his job is, or how often he sees his kids. It’s not anyone’s. When Colby Lewis says, “I need to push back my next start so I can see the birth of my child” (not that he said this; he offered to go on short rest), I don’t have any further questions about that.
by tomemos on Apr 21, 2011 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Baseball vs life
I am a Phillies fan. I wouldn’t like your hypothetical circumstance, but I can’t imagine dinging Doc for it. Family is important. And I respect Lewis’s decision more than Koufax’s.
by Garrigus Carraig on Apr 20, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
???
That last sentence is screaming for an explanation.
by Kalaska on Apr 20, 2011 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Absolutely.
I honestly believe this. As much as I love baseball, the birth of your child comes first. No game would be important enough.
On Twitter: @baseballtwit
by adarowski on Apr 20, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
No I'm not
This is what FIOS connections and Web cams are for.
by Free_AEC on Apr 20, 2011 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
No question
That I would think a lot less of Colby Lewis if he DIDN’T miss the start. Any fan who puts a baseball game ahead of someone being at their kid’s birth should really re-think their priorities. I have no problem with Koufax skipping a playoff game for religious reasons, and I think the birth of a child is more important than that.
The only caveat to this refers back to something I typed earlier: if you are a professional baseball player, and you are trying to have a child (as opposed to an accidental pregnancy), you probably should suspend attempts during January to avoid the issue coming up in October. That just seems like common sense to me. But worries over pushing back a start in April? No.
by Brad Newberg on Apr 20, 2011 12:46 PM EDT reply actions
As an aside....
Anyone else see those Visa commercials during the Super Bowl starring guys who had been to every Super Bowl, and one of the guys said, “I’ve missed weddings, the birth of one of my children,’ a lot of important events for this. But I’m not going to miss a Super Bowl.” All, I could think was: “Congratulations, you’re a jerk.”
by Brad Newberg on Apr 20, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Needs?
The needs of the many? The only people apart from Lewis with “needs” in this scenario are the other Rangers, and I doubt they think less of him for being with his wife while their child was being born.
But if you meant the needs of the fans? Fans don’t have needs, at least not in the context of being fans. Fans only have wants. Baseball is a great game, but it’s still just a game. And it’s not fair to ask something of a baseball player that we wouldn’t also expect of ourselves. I have a feeling neither I nor Richie Whitt nor Rob Neyer would skip the birth of a child so that we could blog about a ballgame, even the World Series.
by chapman_123 on Apr 20, 2011 12:53 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Really?
The only profession I can think of that would prohibit attending the birth of a child is Armed Services, and you really can’t measure any other job against that. I love baseball with all my heart, but in what world is being a professional athlete more important that being in the army, being a doctor, a law enforcement office, a lawyer, or even a street sweeper? Condemning Colby Lewis for doing the right thing is ludicrous, and the people doing it need to take a step back and realize that, although we and many other people place a great deal of importance on what he does, in the end, he’s just playing a game.
by bfriley76 on Apr 20, 2011 12:54 PM EDT reply actions
I think it would be great if the Armed Services could figure out a way
to get dads home for the birth of their kids. I realize all of the practical difficulties with that, but it would still be nice.
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Apr 20, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm a Ranger Fan
and I had no problem with Colby missing his start. In fact he even offered to pitch on short rest on a day the Rangers needed a starter because of a rainout. Ron Washington turned him down and told him the bullpen would take care of that start because the next day was an off day.
by MikeEl on Apr 20, 2011 1:03 PM EDT reply actions
I remember how well I focused on other things when my kids were being born
And if Colby Lewis is anything like I was, the last place I’d want him when his child is being born is out on the mound, given where his head would probably be at.
by Adam J. Morris on Apr 20, 2011 1:17 PM EDT reply actions
True.
And what if there’s a medical emergency during childbirth? The husband and father should absolutely be present. Push back a start…nothing wrong with that. Doesn’t matter if it’s April, September, or October.
613photo
by Black Francis on Apr 20, 2011 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
His and his wife's decision
I don’t necessarily go along with people who say that they would think less of Lewis if he didn’t miss the start. Different individuals, and different families, are different, and I’d presume that they make these decisions based on what’s best for their families. With personal decisions like this, the point is to be non-judgmental across the board, I think.
by tomemos on Apr 20, 2011 1:27 PM EDT reply actions
I'd think a little less of the guy if he DIDN'T go see his kid, to be honest
Like others have said, I think the needs of your family easily trump that of a baseball team, or their fans.
As for whether I’d be mad if this happened in game seven of the WS…I’m an Indians fan, so of course that question is moot. :)
by Matt.Brown on Apr 20, 2011 1:43 PM EDT reply actions
Also
I think this poll would probably be more revealing if you broke up the responses between those who have children and those who don’t.
For what it is worth, I am hard pressed to think of a single Ranger fan on Lone Star Ball who criticized this in any way.
by Adam J. Morris on Apr 20, 2011 2:23 PM EDT reply actions
I'm pretty disappointed to see the responses here...
Let’s get one thing straight, Lewis used his “paternity leave” to indulge himself, certainly not his newborn. Obviously, Lewis just doesn’t care about baseball that much. If his family really needed parenting and he had to leave that would be different. But what we are really talking about is Lewis missing work, work that he is paid very well for, to go and experience some personal indulgence. This is exactly what we should be teaching our young people NOT to do. Presumably his wife would have been able to make it through the birth with competent doctors and familial support whether Lewis was skipping his job that pays the bills or not. One of the main themes of team sports is supposed to be that you put your personal indulgences aside for the good of the team. It’s disconcerting that so many of you are on the wrong side of this issue.
by aaronkc7 on Apr 20, 2011 2:33 PM EDT reply actions
Is this a joke?
by Adam J. Morris on Apr 20, 2011 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Presumably you're against bereavement leave too
since going to a funeral is a “personal indulgence” by the same standard. Missing a game for a religious obligation (Koufax, Yom Kippur) is a personal indulgence. We must never forget that a baseball player is being paid in exchange for his humanity, and Team is the only Family or Religion.
by tomemos on Apr 20, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, actually...
I am against bereavement and funerals are personal indulgences. There is this well-known book with a famous quote called “winning isn’t normal.” The point of it is that if you act “normal” like everyone else then you won’t win because winning and winners are the anomaly. For a MLB player, they shouldn’t be expected to act normal like the rest of us and attend every funeral and birth….they should be acting abnormally because they presumably are winners and want to win…..which means putting aside personal happy feelings that you get when you see your kid being born and go do your job.
by aaronkc7 on Apr 20, 2011 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Why?
Would it be different if he were making the league minimum?
What about if he were a minor leaguer? Would it matter then?
by Adam J. Morris on Apr 20, 2011 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Instead of talking about how gross this is
I’ll instead note that one of the things I like about sports is the human connection to the players. Knowing little details about their interests, their families, their lives as human beings—nothing invasive, just basics that they’re willing to share—makes me feel more connected to the team and the sport. That’s exploded if we insist that players suppress human emotions in order to play at all costs.
by tomemos on Apr 20, 2011 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions
That's fine...
Just know that the Entire Sane World is pretty disgusted with you. Seriously, this isn’t some kind of Vince Lombard spoof?
by CSFreeman on Apr 20, 2011 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Perhaps too far
But the point about indulging himself is true. I don’t remember a single detail about my birth. I can only assume my mom was there, but have no actual memory of it.
The only way a kid cares about a parent not being there at the birth is if dad ends up being a terrible absentee father, and that inital absence becomes a symbol of the bad parenting that actually caused the problems.
That being said, I’m okay with Lewis attending his child’s birth. But let’s not pretend this is about Baby Lewis. It’s definitely about Colby (and most likey his kid’s mom).
by Kalaska on Apr 20, 2011 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Obligations are not indulgences
Just because his obligation isn’t to his child directly doesn’t mean he doesn’t have an obligation to the son’s mother, and to his family at large.
by tomemos on Apr 21, 2011 1:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Selflessness doesn't exist
People have a weird sense of what is selfish. Why must everything be channeled through the guise of selflessness. Why can’t it be awesome that someone wants to see his son’s birth…why does it have to be about OBLIGATION or THE RIGHT THING. Isn’t it more laudable to want to be there without even thinking about all the external forces compelling him there?
So, yeah, I think it’s totally selfish of Lewis to see his child born. And I think it’s great, BECAUSE it’s selfish. And it is selfish…unless he’s going to be there for all the wrong reasons.
by Kalaska on Apr 21, 2011 2:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Okay, I'll go along with that
Though I don’t see why something can’t be an obligation, and something you’d like to do for your own reasons. But yeah: even if a birth is “an indulgence,” so what? It only happens once; it’s not like you can catch it later.
by tomemos on Apr 21, 2011 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions
Ridiculous Trollery
Of course, you can’t actually teach your children anything, because to do so would be merely a personal indulgence and not “winning” behavior.
by Chris Garber on Apr 21, 2011 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions
gotta love some good ’ol fashioned Toxic Masculinity.
Sharlon Schoop - honkbalspeler extraordinaire.
Trolls are like cockroach Nazis. Sure, you CAN try to reason with them, but they won't listen, and if you respond to them, they invade your Sudetenland.
Or something.
That metaphor got away from me.
by Viliphied on Apr 21, 2011 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Riiiiight.
I really wouldn’t want to be married to you.
by Karla Salmon Robinson on Apr 23, 2011 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions
As a fan...
I’m perfectly fine with this. Baseball, at the end of the day, is a game. This is your kid being born, and he only missed a day.
I mean, EVERYONE takes off for the birth of their child, baseball players should certainly be no different.
This is all kind of silly.
Santa Roberto Clemente
Ora Pro Nobis
FireRickReilly
by CTapps on Apr 20, 2011 2:49 PM EDT reply actions
Oh...
And the “needs of the many” line? C’mon. The needs of the many don’t outweigh the needs of the few when the many are baseball fans and the few are your wife who’s giving birth and your child who’s being born.
I like almost everything you write, Rob, but I hope that was a joke that didn’t work quite right.
Santa Roberto Clemente
Ora Pro Nobis
FireRickReilly
by CTapps on Apr 20, 2011 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
RE: Vince Carter
I’m from Toronto and something similar to what Rob proposed in his analogy of the Phillies playoffs game 7 between Roy Halladay/Joe Blanton. Vince Carter was graduation ceremony was on the same day of game 7 between the Raptors/Sixers. Now, he didn’t skip the game but he did attend the ceremony even though it interfered with his schedule. He missed the potential game-winning shot and the Raptors were eliminated. If he had made that shot…he would’ve been lauded. But he missed and was vilified. If Colby Lewis comes back and has a successful season, it will be forgotten. If he stinks, everyone will call to this game.
Unfortunately, whether it is right or wrong depends on the results after-the-fact. Even though, that shouldn’t be the case.
by rsmythe on Apr 20, 2011 3:28 PM EDT reply actions
as a sixers fan
i enjoyed listening to the announcers talk about what a hero vince carter was the entire game while he and iverson exchanged three-pointers, and then watching VC brick the last three. that was an awesome sports experience, and the only relevant sporting event in toronto since 1993.
by puquerda on Apr 21, 2011 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Correction requested
The Rangers won the first game of their series with the Angels. They lost last night in the game that Lewis started.
by LA Seitz on Apr 20, 2011 5:32 PM EDT reply actions
Neyer- r u that desperate for attention since leaving espn?
divide lewis’s warp by 33 starts.
by Rico Vanian on Apr 20, 2011 8:18 PM EDT reply actions
Warp?
As a late commenter myself I do my best to read other stuff first, so as not to double up. Someone already made this comment (and used the right term).
by Kalaska on Apr 20, 2011 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions
It's not a party
I take it that many of you don’t know anyone who’s had a child born with complications or who lost a child or a wife during delivery. NOTHING is guaranteed during childbirth. Though you could pay me a lot to miss seeing the birth of my healthy child, you couldn’t pay me enough to miss being there if something went wrong.
by nuseph on Apr 22, 2011 11:04 AM EDT reply actions
I actually kind of flabbergasted. . .
That this question is even being asked. It’s none of our (the fan’s) business. If the team says it’s ok, then it’s ok. They’re the ones who are paying him. And seriously, one start? Even if it’s Game 7 of the WS, who cares? I love baseball, but have some perspective, here.
The man’s CHILD is being born. Fifty years from now, nobody will care about a day when Colby Lewis didn’t throw a baseball 100 times. His child, however, will presumably still be alive and affecting human lives. Kudos to Colby Lewis for wanting to be there when his child enters the world.
This article is kind of ridiculous and I’m surprised that Rob Neyer even wrote it. I mean, you recognize the human vs. baseball fan distinction, then go off the rails in describing the apparent importance of the game. It’s his JOB and his EMPLOYER gave him the day off. Who cares what baseball fans think?
by s s on Apr 22, 2011 2:35 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Let the man see his child getting born if that is what he wants.
Sure, men don’t have to deal with nine months of pregnancy, and another two years or so of nursing, but dads are important to their kids from day one just like moms. Just because it’s Colby Lewis’ second kid doesn’t mean that his absence from seeing his child getting born doesn’t make this event any less important than his first. Even if this were the playoffs or world series, let him see his kid getting born if that is what he wants to do. As a sports fan, it will be disappointing because he is absent, but this kind of an issue is not something you should harp over on an athlete.
by thewiz06 on Apr 22, 2011 8:51 PM EDT reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed