SB Nation 2011-2012 MLB Free Agents
Dec 5, 2011 - I don't have a problem with giving Jose Reyes $18 million next year.
There's a good chance he'll be worth more than that. The evidence is clear, there.
But $18 million next year, and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that and the year after that?
I honestly don't know. So let's work through some of the math together.
After injury-plagued 2009 and '10 seasons, Reyes somehow put together the best hitting season of his career. In retrospect, we can see a couple of reasons why -- given his improved health, anyway -- Reyes would hit so well. One, he was 27; that's the age at which players most commonly produce their best hitting statistics. And two, he was exceptionally lucky; after entering 2011 with a .308 career batting average on balls in play -- a perfectly normal and reasonable figure -- Reyes batted .353 on balls in play last season.
That huge jump might tell us something about his future if something else in his game changed. But something else didn't. Not in his hitting game. He hit roughly the same percentage of grounders, flies, and line drives as before. More of them just happened to elude the fielders this year. Which isn't likely to happen again.
Then of course there's the injury issue. Here's David Schoenfield:
Obviously, after missing 191 games the past three seasons, Reyes comes with enormous health risks. During the 162-game schedule era, which began in 1961, only 13 shortstops have averaged 140-plus games per season from ages 29 to 34. Not surprisingly, none of them had the extensive injury history that Reyes has had prior to their age-29 seasons. Even ignoring 2009, when he played just 36 games, Reyes has missed 65 games the past two seasons. It seems fair (and logical) to assume Reyes will miss an average of 30 games a season over the life of this contract -- or more than an entire season's worth of games. That's what kept the Mets -- and presumably other teams -- from matching the Marlins' offer of six seasons.
I agree that it's logical to guess Reyes will average roughly 130 games per season over the life of this contract. At best. It takes just one season of 40 games to drop that average quite a bit. But let's say 125-130 games per season. As Schoenfield notes, even at that rate, Reyes is still worth $18 million per season -- easily worth $18 million -- as long as he's hitting. And keeps doing the other things that he's been doing.
That last is the part that worries me. Or would worry me, if I loved the Miami Marlins with the passion of a thousand love songs. As Schoenfield acknowledges elsewhere, Reyes' defense hasn't been good in recent seasons. Not according to our preferred metrics, anyway. He's also not running like he once did.
It seems to me that what the Marlins might be getting for six years is a player who will never hit like that again, and is getting slower both on the bases and at shortstop.
Let's go back to 2008, which is a hitting season more in line with what we might expect, going forward. Reyes was worth 26 runs to the good with the bat, but he also played a ton of games and he was younger. So we'll cut that back to 20 runs (charitably, I suspect). He figures to be good for a couple of baserunning runs. He gets another adjustment of roughly 25 runs for being a shortstop. Now we're up to 47 runs. But he loses five runs for his defense, if you believe the last two years. Which figures to roughly four Wins Above Replacement.
Next year, one WAR will be worth around $4.5 million.
If Reyes does play his 125-130 games next season, he figures to be worth $18 million (give or take).
And that's how the basic math makes this contract look reasonable. Actually, it's funny how often, when you actually do the math, these big free-agent deals do look reasonable.
Of course, we will expect Reyes to decline over the life of the contract. We also expect Wins Above Replacement to cost slightly more with each passing season, because of salary inflation. Does the salary inflation match Reyes' expected age-related decline?
I don't have any idea. I don't have that information handy. Here in Dallas, we have baseball writers, not information. But I'm guessing however you run the numbers, you're going to find that Reyes' expected performance over these next six years is worth slightly less than $119 million, or slightly more. But within whatever margin of error you happen to find acceptable.
If he plays 125-130 games per season.
One catastrophic injury makes this deal look foolish. Two makes it a disaster.
Mickey Hatcher, Angels Hitting Coach, Relieved Of Duties
Vance Worley Has 'Soreness', Will Miss Wednesday Start
Justin Morneau Will Be Activated From DL Wednesday
Manny Ramirez Rehab Assignment Will Start Saturday In Albuquerque
Jon Jay Heading To Disabled List; Shane Robinson Recalled
Troy Tulowitzki Day-To-Day With Deep Leg Bruise
Matt Kemp Goes On 15-Day DL With Sore Hamstring
Jeff Niemann Likely Missing 'A Few Months' With Leg Injury
VIDEO: Bryce Harper's First Career Home Run
Torii Hunter Placed On Restricted List Following Son's Arrest
More News »
Comments
Probably not
Reyes will probably be a flop. Check out where the other marquee free agents might sign. http://www.loveboatsports.com/2011/11/mlb-free-agency-roundtable-2012.html
by henry.emerson on Dec 5, 2011 8:24 AM EST reply actions
Will he be worth it?
Probably. Will he be worth the frustration and injuries attached to that production and value? Probably not.
Something clever...
by Dttl89 on Dec 5, 2011 10:49 AM EST reply actions
Rob
Great piece, and what I find most interesting is that we both ended up at the exact number of runs total for Reyes next season. I went ahead and crunched some numbers even more based on historical precedent to see how well Reyes would match up to his deal:
http://www.fishstripes.com/2011/12/5/2611918/jose-reyes-talented-but-risky-bet-for-marlins
Fish Stripes, a Florida Marlins blog
Author, Baseball Prospectus Fantasy
by Michael Jong on Dec 5, 2011 10:55 AM EST reply actions
I understand
that the Marlins want to fill their new ballpark, but they’ve been pretty successful running a low-budget team for a long time. To just completely re-do themselves and start throwing huge money at iffy stars, that just seems like a recipe for disaster, whether Reyes is worth it for a year or two or not.
Heh-heh. I initially mistyped “worth” as “wirth,” which was probably Freud trying to slip “Werth” into this comment. Which seems appropriate.
by bucdaddy on Dec 5, 2011 11:05 AM EST reply actions
They’ve also had success throwing shit tons of money at free agents. (See: 1997)
And to call Reyes an iffy free agent means there is only one decent free agent this year…and even he may not be the age we think he is. (I don’t believe that conspiracy, but even Pujols isn’t a sure thing by these standards of if-iness.)
by Kalaska on Dec 5, 2011 8:36 PM EST up reply actions
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!
Injuries are unavoidable, even with proper training. $18million a year is very much worth it for Reyes and as a Marlins fan; no more penny stock type players on the field as Loria is surely out to win it this season to inaugurate the new season.
Here we go Marlins Here we go. October is gonna be sensational in Miami in 2012.
Follow @AimHighProfits
Penny Stock Alerts
by mali on Dec 5, 2011 1:58 PM EST reply actions
Maybe, but they’ll mostly be preseason games anyway. Hard to get too excited about that.
by Phrozen on Dec 5, 2011 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
I cant believe the Mets lost one of their prime players...
… to the Marlins no less. Fucking Wilpons.
by Brendl on Dec 6, 2011 11:00 AM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed