The Dodgers appear to have their infield all in place for the 2012 regular season, and looking at it just really bums me out.
Dec 1, 2011 - I'll admit from the get-go that this is probably going to be a difficult concept to convey. The thesis of this post is that, as noted above in the summary, looking at the Los Angeles Dodgers' infield bums me out. We all have different responses to things, and it's possible that my response to the Dodgers' infield is not in line with your response to the Dodgers' infield. But hear me out. I mean, you're already reading this, so you might as well.
In some respects, the Dodgers have a lot of good things going on these days. They just signed star center fielder Matt Kemp to an eight-year contract extension. The team has been all but freed from the clutches of Frank McCourt. Vin Scully is very much still hanging around, and Clayton Kershaw was recently named 2011 National League Cy Young Award winner. The Dodgers have positives -- more, perhaps, than a few other teams, or than more than a few other teams.
But there's something about the Dodgers that brings me down. Understand that I am not a fan of the Dodgers, or of a team that is a rival of the Dodgers, or of a team that is even in the same league as the Dodgers. I do not have any emotional investment. But what they've done...it only really dawned on me when news broke that they'd signed Adam Kennedy to a major league contract. The Dodgers have now put together the following infield:
C: A.J. Ellis (Matt Treanor)
1B: James Loney (Adam Kennedy)
2B: Mark Ellis (Justin Sellers)
SS: Dee Gordon (Justin Sellers)
3B: Juan Uribe (Adam Kennedy)
Looking over that infield just makes me really depressed. Not actually depressed, like Buffalo, but baseball depressed, where I look at this group and feel like it would suck the fun out of things if I had to watch it every day. When I look at this group I wear the facial expression of someone who's flaking out on plans with someone else for the second time in two days. Furrowed eyebrows, teeth bared, drawing in air. fsssssss
Behind the plate, the Dodgers will rely on an unproven Ellis, but this unproven Ellis is actually 30 years old, and has 21 home runs in his entire professional career. At first base there's Loney, who's among the least exciting first basemen of his generation. The 34-year-old other Ellis has been brought in to play second, and he's praying for a bounce-back at the wrong age to pray for a bounce-back. Gordon is the resident youngster at short, and he's a top prospect, but he's a top prospect with zero power, a raw approach, and a raw glove. And at third, there's the 32-year-old Uribe, who last season was a disaster.
And the bench isn't any prettier. The Dodgers paid to bring in Treanor, who is old and bad. They brought in Kennedy, who is old and bad, with bat speed as if he were swinging through custard. Sellers, at least, is in his mid-20s, but he's also of limited ability, and there's still time for him to be displaced by someone else.
It's not that the Dodgers' infield is guaranteed to be a mess. There is a case to be made for every one of these players making a positive contribution in the coming year. But it's just so ... I'm going to re-use this word -- unexciting. It is a spectacularly unexciting infield. You look at this infield and you don't even want to make jokes. It just makes you appreciate your own infield more, the way being sick makes you appreciate health.
I really do think the Dodgers have the least exciting, most depressing infield in baseball. There are, of course, a few other contenders. I counted the Astros, the A's, the Cubs, the Padres, the Pirates, and the Twins. But the Twins have the Morneau and Mauer wild cards, while the other infields are much younger, still being built, or both. The Dodgers strike me as having the worst combination of age and skill sets.
Here's the good news for the Dodgers: it isn't the infield that matters. It's the whole team that matters, and the whole team has players like Kemp, Kershaw, Chad Billingsley, Andre Ethier, and Kenley Jansen. There's talent there, compelling talent, and it's not like watching the Dodgers will be like watching a powered-off copier. It isn't quite fair to focus on the infield alone.
But, oh man, the infield. I look at the infield and I feel a slight tinge of sadness. There's a "Dodger blue" joke to be made here. I just don't have the heart to make it.
Mickey Hatcher, Angels Hitting Coach, Relieved Of Duties
Vance Worley Has 'Soreness', Will Miss Wednesday Start
Justin Morneau Will Be Activated From DL Wednesday
Manny Ramirez Rehab Assignment Will Start Saturday In Albuquerque
Jon Jay Heading To Disabled List; Shane Robinson Recalled
Troy Tulowitzki Day-To-Day With Deep Leg Bruise
Matt Kemp Goes On 15-Day DL With Sore Hamstring
Jeff Niemann Likely Missing 'A Few Months' With Leg Injury
VIDEO: Bryce Harper's First Career Home Run
Torii Hunter Placed On Restricted List Following Son's Arrest
More News »
Comments
it's ugly
real ugly, and I hope it gets better in 2012.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 1, 2011 12:00 PM EST reply actions
sorry
2013
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 1, 2011 12:00 PM EST reply actions
You're not a fan of ANY team in the NL?
Now THAT’S depressing.
Rob
-- In baseball we trust.
by RobBobS on Dec 1, 2011 12:10 PM EST reply actions
I agree with just about everything in the post, with one major exception. Dee Gordon is spectacularly exciting. He is a blur on the basepaths. He has off-the-charts range at short and plays the game with the giddiness of a child. He will not hit for power, he will not get on base often enough to use his speed and he will make some mind-boggling errors, but he is, without question, exciting.
"It's supposed to be hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. The hard... is what makes it great."
by Nolij on Dec 1, 2011 12:12 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I disagree with one thing myself
We have Jim Loney playing at 1B, not James Loney :) Jim Loney is the stud who opsed over 1.000 in the last 2 months of 2011, James in the one who was putting up the worst season for a 1B ever the first 4 months.
TBLA 2011 Postseason Prediction Champion
by Ivdown on Dec 1, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
ha!
Jim may have turned the corner……fingers crossed
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 1, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
Gordon
has had many critics, but he keeps proving them wrong…..and I think he will continue to do so.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 1, 2011 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
I wish there was hope to sign Aramis Ramirez
It might not be a good contract in 2 years, but he’d certainly help now.
TBLA 2011 Postseason Prediction Champion
by Ivdown on Dec 1, 2011 12:13 PM EST reply actions
An infield where James Loney is by far the best player.
A shameful infield.
Minor League Central @mlcentral @andrewngrant
by regfairfield on Dec 1, 2011 12:26 PM EST reply actions
???
Dee Gordon is the best player in that infield.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 1, 2011 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
If he hits .300 sure. If his BABIP drops 20 points that’s gonna get ugly fast.
Minor League Central @mlcentral @andrewngrant
by regfairfield on Dec 1, 2011 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
Or an infield where Dee Gordon is the best player.
A shameful infield.
Minor League Central @mlcentral @andrewngrant
by regfairfield on Dec 1, 2011 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Whatever the infield looks like today by Sept it will only be Gordon at SS.
Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen
by Phil Gurnee on Dec 1, 2011 12:30 PM EST reply actions
+1
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Dec 1, 2011 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
lol omg fyi fwiw
Our infield is obviously being built around defense. Luckily we play in the NL West where Championships are won with shitty offenses.
Dodger Sims | Twitter | Xei On Sports
by Xeifrank on Dec 1, 2011 12:31 PM EST reply actions
Arizona had a shitty offense?
Patience is for those who die waiting for something to happen
by Phil Gurnee on Dec 1, 2011 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Oakland infield
While the Oakland TEAM is unexciting overall, the mere presence of Jemile Weeks immediately disqualifies them from having an unexciting infield. This guy is already one of the most riveting players in the game. That’s not to say he’s a budding superstar or anything; he was good last year, and he may or not be good again this year. But the guy is EXCITING. He succeeds and fails spectacularly at all times.
He might leg out a double on a routine single, or blur around to third for a triple, or steal a base with his dreadlocks flying. Always with the dreadlocks. Every. Single. Time. Find me a video of Weeks running with his helmet ON, and I’ll give you $10 (note: it will be Monopoly money).
On the other hand, he might make an acrobatic play at 2nd, only to airmail the throw into the stands. He might steal second easily, but overslide the bag and get tagged out (he did this at least 3-5 times last year, which is why I think his low SB% is somewhat misleading). But NOTHING Weeks does is boring.
by ahhall on Dec 1, 2011 3:25 PM EST reply actions
Royals 2011 OF
There were similar comments made about the Royals’ 2011 outfield, which turned out to be (possibly) the best in the American League. I don’t see the same type of upside with the Dodgers’ IF as there was with the Royals’ 2011 OF, but strange things happen.
by Stephen Suffron on Dec 1, 2011 4:46 PM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed